DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStanković, Radomiren
dc.contributor.authorMilenović, Dejanen
dc.contributor.authorJanković, Draganen
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-01T20:29:18Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-01T20:29:18Z-
dc.date.issued1999-01-01en
dc.identifier.isbn978-0-769-50161-3-
dc.identifier.issn0195-623Xen
dc.identifier.urihttp://researchrepository.mi.sanu.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2144-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper we compare effects of two different domain groups for switching functions to the efficiency of calculation of spectral transforms (ST) representations and the complexity of Decision diagrams (DDs) representations. Dyadic groups and quaternion groups are assumed for domain groups for switching functions. We compared space and time complexity in calculation of STs representations through FFT. DDs are compared in terms of their basic characteristics, the depth, the width, and the size. The area of a DD, defined as the product of size and width, and for word-level DDs, the ratio between the number of non-terminal and constant nodes are discussed as another characteristics of DDs dependent on the domain groups. It is shown that the quaternion groups have advantages in processing of large switching functions. When number of variables grows, these advantages increases.en
dc.publisherIEEE-
dc.relation.ispartofProceedings of The International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logicen
dc.titleQuaternion groups versus dyadic groups in representations and processing of switching functionsen
dc.typeArticleen
dc.relation.conference29th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL-99); Freiburg im Breisgau, Ger; 20 May 1999 through 22 May 1999-
dc.identifier.doi10.1109/ISMVL.1999.779689-
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-0032629632en
dc.relation.firstpage18en
dc.relation.lastpage23en
item.openairecristypehttp://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf-
item.openairetypeArticle-
item.cerifentitytypePublications-
item.fulltextNo Fulltext-
item.grantfulltextnone-
Show simple item record

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

5
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Page view(s)

16
checked on Nov 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.