Collapsing ω2 with semi-proper forcing

DC Field	Value	Language
dc.contributor.author	Todorčević, Stevo	en
dc.date.accessioned	2020-05-01T20:29:21Z	-
dc.date.available	2020-05-01T20:29:21Z	-
dc.date.issued	2018-02-01	en
dc.identifier.issn	0933-5846	en
dc.identifier.uri	http://researchrepository.mi.sanu.ac.rs/handle/123456789/2174	-
dc.description.abstract	We examine the differences between three standard classes of forcing notions relative to the way they collapse the continuum. It turns out that proper and semi-proper posets behave differently in that respect from the class of posets that preserve stationary subsets of ω1.	en
dc.publisher	Springer Link	-
dc.relation.ispartof	Archive for Mathematical Logic	en
dc.subject	Forcing \| Oscillation \| Stationary set	en
dc.title	Collapsing ω2 with semi-proper forcing	en
dc.type	Article	en
dc.identifier.doi	10.1007/s00153-017-0588-x	en
dc.identifier.scopus	2-s2.0-85029896868	en
dc.relation.firstpage	185	en
dc.relation.lastpage	194	en
dc.relation.issue	1-2	en
dc.relation.volume	57	en
dc.description.rank	M23	-
item.cerifentitytype	Publications	-
item.openairecristype	http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_18cf	-
item.openairetype	Article	-
item.grantfulltext	none	-
item.fulltext	No Fulltext	-
crisitem.author.orcid	0000-0003-4543-7962	-

1

checked on Jun 1, 2024

41

checked on May 9, 2024

Check